- Dominic Wainford built the playground for his children three years ago and says he was never told he needed planning approval
- Planning officials say the £40,000 structure is ‘bulky and visually unsympathetic’ and must be shifted
By
Emily Allen
16:02 GMT, 9 August 2012
|
16:02 GMT, 9 August 2012
A multi-millionaire who spent £40,000 on a ‘Tarzan’ climbing frame for his children in the grounds of his country mansion has been ordered to move it – and says the work will cost up to £50,000.
Father-of-five Dominic Wainford, a 44-year-old director whose London-based Wainford Holdings investment firm which has been valued at £30 million, owns historic Heathfield Park in Sussex, a Grade II* listed manor house set in 350 acres of landscaped grounds.
He built the huge adventure playground for his children three years ago and says he was never told he needed planning approval.
Not happy: Dominic Wainford next to the £40,000 climbing frame outside his home in Heathfield Park which he has to move as Wealden Council thinks it’s ‘bulk and visually unsympathetic’
Now he’s been ordered by Wealden Council to rip it down, with planning officers saying he should have applied for consent and it is ‘bulky and visually unsympathetic’ and must be shifted.
Mr Wainford has been forced to apply to the council for permission to dismantle it and move it almost 100 feet to the other side of his driveway – work he says will cost £50,000.
He said: ‘When we bought the climbing frame, we were told it didn’t need planning permission. You can’t see it from the road and if you had enough strong men you could lift it up, so I was surprised when a planning consultant said we needed permission.’
The playground, which includes a timber play house, climbing frame and slide, is nearly 35 feet long and more than 13 feet high, with three chutes, two slides, bridges and swings.
He said: ‘I’ve got five small children from nine months old to seven years and we can see them playing from the window. Sometimes with their friends, there can be 50 children on there and moving it further from the house will make it less safe.
‘By the time I’ve paid for planning consultants and everything, it could have cost me £50,000 to get the job done.
On the move: The playground, which includes a timber
play house, climbing frame and slide, is nearly 35 feet long and more
than 13 feet high, with three chutes, two slides, bridges and swings but has to be relocated
‘I’d much rather have been told where to put it in the first place and given the money to charity. It’s not fixed to anything and we’re just very disappointed.’
‘There’s no animosity towards the council but I’m very disappointed about the whole thing. There’s been some suggestions that we’ve done this deliberately, but that’s not the case.
‘We’re going to have to change the drive, put some gates up, and change the flow of traffic, because our main concern is to protect the safety of the children, and where it’s going to is a less safe environment.’
The revised planning application has been agreed by council officers using delegated powers.
Heathfield and Waldron Parish Council clerk Diana Francis said: ‘My council supports the revised application and considers it a more suitable site, which would not impact upon the listed building.’
Tom Foxall, historic buildings inspector for English Heritage, said: ‘We previously expressed serious concerns about the positioning of a large children’s play area to the east of the Grade II*-listed Heathfield Park, but do not wish to object to this revised proposal to re-site it.’
A Wealden council spokesman said: ‘A structure of this size so close to a Grade II* listed building and inside a Grade II historic park, requires planning permission because it dominates its surroundings.
‘We have been taking enforcement action to have it moved. We are pleased the owner has now obtained planning permission to move the climbing frame to a location that is more in keeping with the historic landscape at Heathfield Park.’
-
Time to get a tandem? Cycling star Laura Trott confirms she… -
Sneers from the French, whining in Australia and a lot of… -
‘Tia, come home babes’: Step-grandfather makes emotional… -
Conjoined twins who fall ill together and have to scratch… -
Parkinson’s disease sufferer, 54, held by police at Olympic… -
Extraordinary moment chef at Michelin-starred restaurant… -
Crowd gasps in horror as Cuban vaulter’s pole snaps in three… -
Kate loses her golden touch: Duchess of Cambridge cheers… -
‘He chewed up my face and plucked out my eyes’: Miami… -
Judge blasts sentencing rules as he jails pair who crippled… -
The hottest ticket in town: Misty May-Treanor and Kerri… -
A little corner of England? No it’s a Chinese knock-off!…
Share this article:
Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
This is not a permanent structure, what’s the fuss?
Report abuse
The council is just jealous. Let the kids have some fun you old grumps.
Report abuse
Why can’t busy body councils do something productive, rather than idiotic things like this?!
It angers me that this is where priorities lie, rather than sorting other REAL problems in societies.
This country is becoming more frustrating!!
Report abuse
Maybe your spoilt kiddies can do with a slide and swing like most kids do? Just saying……
Report abuse
Poor guy, hurting no-one, looking after his kids, and being hassled by loony planners for what he does in his OWN garden, where no-one can see. Sack them !
Report abuse
If it can be lifted up and move then it really should be classified as a temporary structure and not in need of planning consent.
Report abuse
Dominic, £50,000 is ridiculous. Three good tradesman and myself will have it moved in a week for £15,000.
You truly do have more money than sense.
Report abuse
I am nineteen years old… but that climbing frame looks SO FUN.
Report abuse
I am nineteen years old… but that climbing frame looks SO FUN.
Report abuse
but there is no view of his house to obstruct.how did the council find out it was there?without trespassing on his land
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.